Comments on: So, did you know? http://sndbx.org/2007/06/13/so-did-you-know/ Enriching and challenging the blog design community in high semantic style Sat, 22 Nov 2008 07:55:03 +0000 By: Scott http://sndbx.org/2007/06/13/so-did-you-know/#comment-69 Scott Mon, 18 Jun 2007 14:21:55 +0000 http://www.sndbx.org/2007/06/13/so-did-you-know/#comment-69 Thanks for coming by, Tyler. You'll see in the <a href="http://www.sndbx.org/judging/" title="Judging Procedures" rel="nofollow">judging procedures</a> that Safari is part of the brief. Yes, it is one of the important browsers for designers. And I didn't just pull the 1% thing out of the air, but I will correct myself by correcting it to 1.5%, according to the <a href="http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp" rel="nofollow">W3</a>. I wasn't slighting the Mac community. I use a Mac at work and a PC at home. Thanks for coming by, Tyler. You’ll see in the judging procedures that Safari is part of the brief. Yes, it is one of the important browsers for designers.

And I didn’t just pull the 1% thing out of the air, but I will correct myself by correcting it to 1.5%, according to the W3. I wasn’t slighting the Mac community. I use a Mac at work and a PC at home.

]]> By: Tyler Regas http://sndbx.org/2007/06/13/so-did-you-know/#comment-68 Tyler Regas Mon, 18 Jun 2007 14:06:46 +0000 http://www.sndbx.org/2007/06/13/so-did-you-know/#comment-68 I'm pleased to see this contest, but I take exception to the 1% comment. The Mac community is 22 million 10.4 users strong and Apple has a proven 6% market. While you may disdain Macs, I strongly urge you to accommodate that market. Also of note, Safari 3 for Windows and Mac renders my site correctly, where 2.x didn't. I’m pleased to see this contest, but I take exception to the 1% comment. The Mac community is 22 million 10.4 users strong and Apple has a proven 6% market. While you may disdain Macs, I strongly urge you to accommodate that market. Also of note, Safari 3 for Windows and Mac renders my site correctly, where 2.x didn’t.

]]> By: Scott http://sndbx.org/2007/06/13/so-did-you-know/#comment-60 Scott Thu, 14 Jun 2007 15:46:48 +0000 http://www.sndbx.org/2007/06/13/so-did-you-know/#comment-60 Yes, <code>hidden</code> indeed. Note that I am neither entering this comp with a CSS design nor judging the final designs. :-P Yes, hidden indeed. Note that I am neither entering this comp with a CSS design nor judging the final designs. :-P

]]> By: sunburntkamel http://sndbx.org/2007/06/13/so-did-you-know/#comment-59 sunburntkamel Thu, 14 Jun 2007 15:42:46 +0000 http://www.sndbx.org/2007/06/13/so-did-you-know/#comment-59 yeah, unfortunately smackfoo's site is down, he had the JS version. you can see it in my joshuaink port. also, your code up above should say <code>hidden</code>, not hide ;-) yeah, unfortunately smackfoo’s site is down, he had the JS version. you can see it in my joshuaink port.

also, your code up above should say hidden, not hide ;-)

]]> By: Scott http://sndbx.org/2007/06/13/so-did-you-know/#comment-58 Scott Thu, 14 Jun 2007 15:37:29 +0000 http://www.sndbx.org/2007/06/13/so-did-you-know/#comment-58 And good old Andy wrote a whole post on <a href="http://andy.wordpress.com/2006/08/14/defective-themes-image-width/" rel="nofollow">defective image widths in themes</a>, for yet further reading. And good old Andy wrote a whole post on defective image widths in themes, for yet further reading.

]]>